Quantcast
Channel: SCN : All Content - SAP Extended Warehouse Management (SAP EWM)
Viewing all 1703 articles
Browse latest View live

Guidance for beginner in EWM

$
0
0

Hello Members,

 

I am planning to learn SAP EWM. (course not yet started)

 

Technically:

 

What to focus on?

What things to do?

How to become a strong EWM consultant (with time)?

How to equip myself for the job market?

 

Thanks!

TW


Warehouse Door & Staging bay determination in inbound delivery

$
0
0

Hi All

 

I have maintained below configurations but system is not able to determine door & staging bay automatically.

 

1. Storage types, storage sections and bins for door, staging area

2. Staging area/door determination group

3. defined warehouse doors

4. assignment of SA/D det.grp & staging areas to door

5. /SCWM/DOOR_SCU - Assign Door Storage Bin and Supply Chain Unit

6. /SCWM/STADET_IN - Staging Area and Door Determination (Inbound)

7. /SCWM/GMBIN_DET - Maintain Goods Movement Bin Determination

 

Please suggest what I missed.

 

Thanks

Sasidhar Gupta

ewm to erp quick access

$
0
0

Hello,

Is it possible using comannd field to switch form ewm menu to ERP basic easy access menu?

 

Thank you inadvance: Vladislav Terziev

2 step picking

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

We use 2 step Pick for our outbound process but the interim zone we use should have no negative stock allowed and there are multiple bins in it

everything is working fine...except we want that in the step of release withdrawal from wave the stock going to interim area should be allocated to particular identification so that a second wave release will not pick the stock which is withdrawn for first wave

 

We tried with stock identification for withdrawal process type 2020 but it doesn't work

is there any other possibility to achieve it ?

 

Thanks,

Roopendra

Infinite warehouse tasks in inbound process

$
0
0

Hi All

 

I would like to share with all my experience while configuring inbound process using POSC. My scenario is like this.

 

1. Unload stock from door and put at staging area.

2. Move stock from staging area to final bin.

 

For this, I have configured POSC with two steps

1. INB1 - to unload stock with automatic creation of put-away task

2. INB3 - to put-away stock

 

After unloading the stock from door, system shows that there no packed/unpacked stock for unloading. Because, I have already completed the first step and using POSC system automatically created put-away task. After confirming the put-away task surprisingly, I could see the status of document as PutAway - Not Started and Warehouse Activity - Partially Completed.

 

When I go back to /scwm/prdi, follow on functions --> warehouse task, I could see same HU ready for unloading. When I see this, I was surprised and clueless. After going through my POSC and Warehouse process type, I feel that everything looks okay but still no clue about this weird behavior. Finally I found that storage type role (where final bin belongs to) was set to "D" - staging area group.

 

After changing this to standard storage type, I was able to set the document status as complete.

 

Thanks

Sasidhar Gupta

 

We can play with EWM too not only C/Java programs.

Upload Warehouse data in Product master in EWM

$
0
0


Hi Experts,

 

Please share your expertise to understand how to upload Warehouse data e.g:  max and minimum replenishment qty, Putaway control indicator etc. in Product master in SAP EWM implementation.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

 

Regards,

 

Prashant

Error in Rearrangement

$
0
0

Dear Gurus,

 

I am doing rearrangement through t code /n/SCWM/REAR.

The value in "Total of Storage Position Evaluations" is appearing as 99999 irrespective of any value maintained in "Evaluate Whse Item" in customizing for storage type, storage section, bin type.

While creating warehouse task, system is determining the destination bin, but the "Evaluation of Optimum Warehouse Position" also appearing as 99999. Task is not getting creating created with below errors.

Could not find a bin in the optimum (Message no. /SCWM/UI_REAR011)

Warehouse order (product STER-02) not created; no improvement possible (Message no. /SCWM/UI_REAR009).

 

Note: Getting the same error for rearrangement with or without slotting.

 

Highly appreciate any pointer in the issue.

 

With Regards,

Malay

Wrong value in "Total of Storage Position Evaluations" in Rearrangement

$
0
0

Dear Gurus,

 

I am doing rearrangement through t code /n/SCWM/REAR.

The value in "Total of Storage Position Evaluations" is appearing as 99999 irrespective of any value maintained in "Evaluate Whse Item" in customizing for storage type, storage section, bin type.

While creating warehouse task, system is determining the destination bin, but the "Evaluation of Optimum Warehouse Position" also appearing as 99999. Task is not getting creating created with below errors.

Could not find a bin in the optimum (Message no. /SCWM/UI_REAR011)

Warehouse order (product STER-02) not created; no improvement possible (Message no. /SCWM/UI_REAR009).

 

Note: Getting the same error for rearrangement with or without slotting.

 

Highly appreciate any pointer in the issue.

 

With Regards,

Malay



Quality Inspection in EWM - Partly accepted scenario

$
0
0

Hello Everyone

 

I need help regarding partially accepted scenario. For example out of 10 Cases/Item XYZ of qty 10, 4 are good and remaining 6 are not good. Business wants to accept only those 4 and return remaining 6. In this scenario, how do we configure the follow up actions? Do we get item/quantity wise updates form ECC? I have maintained quality score 50 against decision and assigned below PTWP action to it. Whenever that decision code was used in ECC, it is properly updating inspection document in EWM. But EWM, is making the 100% qty as Accepted with follow up action PTWP.

 

  1. 1.      Do we need results recording in ECC for this scenario?
  2. 2.      Do we need to implement any BADI to select which Case/Item can be accepted/rejected?
  3. 3.      Is HU mandatory for performing QI in EWM?

 

In the EWM system, I could not configure more than 1 follow up action for a decision code.


Thanks

Sasidhar Gupta

V_T3010 report

$
0
0

Hi all,

How can I get a report with all fields of the V_T3010 table?

Using SE16n only the fields MANDT, LGNUM, LGTYP are available.

Destination storage bin determination issue

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

When we deconsolidate the ASN, some of the products getting into correct destination bin and some products are not getting into correct destination bin, getting into one inbound over flow storage type defined. When i looked at product master, strategies and storage types configuration the difference i see between actual storage types and overflow storage type is:

1. HU requirement option. i.e. for actual storage types - HU requirement not allowed and for Overflow storage type - HU requirement allowed but not requirement.

 

2. For actual storage type ---- Mixed storage selected as "several HUs with different Batches of the same product" for putaway rule: Addition to existing stock/empty bin and for Overflow storage type - Mixed storage without limitations

  

Can you please help me if anything is wrong with above selection at storage type level?

 

Untitled.png

Thank you...

Sridahr

 

Message was edited by: SRIDHAR B

VL158- Delivery does not allow the required change

$
0
0

We have DWM (distributed warehouse),


We create purchase order against which inbound delivery is created. This inbound delivery is replicated from ECC to DWM through IDOCS.


Process is

1. ECC client – inbound delivery is created

2. DWM client – Inb deliv through idoc replicated

3. In DWM goods received done (vl32n), idoc created

4. In ECC idoc should be replicated, idoc is created but with error 51 which further shows error of VL158-DELIVERY DOES NOT ALLOW THE REQUIRED CHANGE


RFC connection is good no problem with that, we are unable to identify why system is throwing this error. Can anyone assist us in resolving the issue.


Regards

Anand

Stock removal issue

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

To make a finish product of hose i need to pick different components as per order. In that I need to pick a hose for example : 50 EA. If I see physically in storage type I can get 50 EA, greater than 50 EA and less than 50 EA but for example if 100 EA placed in bin earlier than other pieces.

 

When the user looks for picking 50EA of hose it is giving him 100 EA hose because of FIFO rule , then user to cut the hose and use only for 50 EA. But, we need to make efficient pick I mean system should have picked 50EA because it is available in bin.

 

Can you please suggest what is the best pick rule to make the efficient pick ? Using EWM 7.0 version.

 

Thank you in advance.

Need to enter the storage bin manually

$
0
0

Hi Team,

Currently while posting the IM movement type 311, storage type(FIFO) search strategy is configured for stock removal process.

Now the requirement is for certain materials, while doing the transaction, we don't want to pick the bin automatically(by using the FIFO), we want to enter the Storage bin manually, please suggest.

Advanced Thanks,

AN Reddy.

Decoding Barcode in EWM

$
0
0

Hi All

 

Could you please help me with required configurations in EWM to decode barcodes? In the warehouse we have several slips for putaway/picking/packing and warehouse resource will scan the barcode and confirms the task. Whenever he scans the scanner will provide the barcode data to the system but how the system will decode it and fills the form data. Please guide. Also I would like to know the different barcode technologies does it support.

 

Thanks

Sasidhar Gupta


Unable to do CIF for material master

$
0
0

Hello Experts ,

 

I'm trying to do CIF of material master from ECC to EWM system . I'm getting error  -  Logical system P31CLNT001 has not been assigned to any business system group.

 

I have checked the below Settings  :

 

- In ECC , Logical system and assignment .APOCLNT890 is EWM system and T90CLNT090 is ECC system .

-In SCM side , Maintain Business Groups , it is maintained as BSG_EWM ( Business System Group EWM ) and ERPPDC ( Business System Grp for ERP ) BSG_EWM is assigned to APOCLNT890 and T90CLNT090.

 

I'm not understanding from where P31CLNT001 is fetching and giving error while data transfer . Can anybody help me  Please  ??

 

Thanks and Regards

Pavan

2 different PPF actions triggering two different smartforms

$
0
0

Hi,

How to trigger two or three different smart-forms (which are triggered using different PPF actions) on to the same spool?

Suppose I have two ppf actions

1. triggers  X smartform.

2 triggers   Y smartform.

 

one after the other. Now the requirement is get the both into one spool. I know we can do by open-spool and close-spool. But I'm not looking for this solution.

Is there any specific configuraation with PPFs?

 

Thanks,

Sandhya

Inbound delivery not getting active

$
0
0

Dear All ,

 

I would like to find exact cause of inbound delivery error status , kindly guide as how can  i achieve same.

 

Message log / check button is not  dsplaying error messages.

 

Capture.JPG

 

 

Thanks

Jinoy

Difference between warehouse data and storage type tabs in product master

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

If the product is maintained in Warehouse data tab with storage types in order of X, Y and Z and in storage type tab storage types are maintained in order

of Y, X, Z. As per my knowledge if the system considers for putaway with Warehouse data tab, what is the use of storage type tab?

 

if i am wrong, how does systems works with those tabs and in which cases (Putaway and Replenishment and any others etc..)?

 

Can you please clarify me on this difference?

 

Thank you...

Sridhar

SAP Hana with EWM 9.1

$
0
0

Hi EWM followers,

 

I am opening this discussion to try to understand what is really available on SAP EWM with SAP Hana (except the labor demand part which is more clear).

Yes there's some documentation available but at the end I didn't really succeed to make my mind on that.

 

- Can EWM run entirely on SAP HANA (meaning document creation, modification,.. are only stored and commit within an hana DB) or HANA is just available with the "side by side" approach involving SLT tool, etc...?

 

- If HANA is activated only with the "side by side" approach. How EWM knows where to query information (classic SQL DB or Hana)? Does the code needs to be changed (either standard or Z) or it queries database in hana by itself when they are replicated to hana?

 

Thanks everyone for sharing your understanding/knowledge on this.

 

JM

Viewing all 1703 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>